Presentation On MARK I FPA AND MARK II FPA
Download
MARK I FPA AND MARK II FPA Presentation Transcript:
1.MARK I FPA AND
MARK II FPA
2.OBJECTIVES OF MARK I FPA
MEASURE FUNCTIONALITY OF A SOFTWARE SYSTEM AS SEEN FROM THE USER’S PERSPECTIVE.
MEASURE THE SIZE OF SOFTWARE SYSTEMS INDEPENDENT OF TECHNOLOGY USED FOR IMPLEMENTATION.
CREATE A MEASUREMENT METHODOLOGY THAT IS SIMPLE ENOUGH TO MINIMIZE THE OVERHEAD OF THE MEASUREMENT PROCESS
3.Schematic Representation of the MARK I Method :
4.MARK II FPA
Mark II FPA was developed by Charles Symons in 1990.
WHY MARK II
IDENTIFICATION OF ILFs IN MARK I IS TRICKY
THE CHOICE OF FOURTEEN FACTORS IS RESTRICTIVE AND OTHER FACTORS NEED TO BE CONSIDERED
MARK I IS MORE SUITABLE FOR SYSTEMS WITH DISCRETE COMPONENTS RATHER THAN INTEGRATED
WHEN SMALLER SYSTEMS ARE COMBINED INTO LARGER , ITS FP COUNT IS LESS THAN SUM OF FP COUNT OF SMALLER
5.Schematic Representation of the Mark II FPA Method :
6.DIFFERENCE
Download
MARK I FPA AND MARK II FPA Presentation Transcript:
1.MARK I FPA AND
MARK II FPA
2.OBJECTIVES OF MARK I FPA
MEASURE FUNCTIONALITY OF A SOFTWARE SYSTEM AS SEEN FROM THE USER’S PERSPECTIVE.
MEASURE THE SIZE OF SOFTWARE SYSTEMS INDEPENDENT OF TECHNOLOGY USED FOR IMPLEMENTATION.
CREATE A MEASUREMENT METHODOLOGY THAT IS SIMPLE ENOUGH TO MINIMIZE THE OVERHEAD OF THE MEASUREMENT PROCESS
3.Schematic Representation of the MARK I Method :
4.MARK II FPA
Mark II FPA was developed by Charles Symons in 1990.
WHY MARK II
IDENTIFICATION OF ILFs IN MARK I IS TRICKY
THE CHOICE OF FOURTEEN FACTORS IS RESTRICTIVE AND OTHER FACTORS NEED TO BE CONSIDERED
MARK I IS MORE SUITABLE FOR SYSTEMS WITH DISCRETE COMPONENTS RATHER THAN INTEGRATED
WHEN SMALLER SYSTEMS ARE COMBINED INTO LARGER , ITS FP COUNT IS LESS THAN SUM OF FP COUNT OF SMALLER
5.Schematic Representation of the Mark II FPA Method :
6.DIFFERENCE
No comments:
Post a Comment